

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... The Ocean at the End of the Lane (2013)by Neil Gaiman
![]()
Best Fantasy Novels (77) » 69 more Books Read in 2015 (17) Magic Realism (18) Books Read in 2017 (70) Best Urban Fantasy (69) Witchy Fiction (51) Books Read in 2022 (53) Favourite Books (506) To Read (1) Short and Sweet (56) Best Mythic Fiction (10) Books Read in 2016 (1,059) Overdue Podcast (76) KayStJ's to-read list (105) Indie Next Picks (3) Best Family Stories (164) Books Read in 2024 (2,630) Books Read in 2019 (2,355) Faerie Mythology (58) Books Read in 2023 (4,327) Books Read in 2020 (4,339) SHOULD Read Books! (49) Reading 2014 (1) Year 9 Reading List (16) To Read - Horror (48) Books read in 2015 (16) Read in 2014 (36) Horror Stories (10) Books Tagged Abuse (60) Ocean Setting (4) 5 Best 5 Years (65) 2010s (104) 100 Hemskaste (67) Horror Read (10) Biggest Disappointments (411) Five star books (1,696)
Neil Gaiman's new book, The Ocean at the End of the Lane, will completely fill you, head and heart. This book may have just been published, but the story it tells is an ancient one. It is a story of friendship, sacrifice, growing up, and overcoming our fear of the dark; a story immersed in myth and mystery. It is the first story, and the last, all in one beautifully written, 178 page package. I actually woke up at 1:30 this morning just to finish this book. I was tossing and turning, unable to sleep thinking about it. I just had to finish it before I would be able to sleep again. Neil Gaiman, you glorious man, you've done it again! The more I think about this book, the more I think it will replace Stardust as my favorite Gaiman book.
The Ocean at the End of the Lane arouses, and satisfies, the expectations of the skilled reader of fairytales, and stories which draw on fairytales. Fairytales, of course, were not invented for children, and deal ferociously with the grim and the bad and the dangerous. But they promise a kind of resolution, and Gaiman keeps this promise. [Gaiman's] mind is a dark fathomless ocean, and every time I sink into it, this world fades, replaced by one far more terrible and beautiful in which I will happily drown. The story is tightly plotted and exciting. Reading it feels a lot like diving into an extremely smart, morally ambiguous fairy tale. And indeed, Gaiman's adult protagonist observes at one point that fairy tales aren't for kids or grownups — they're just stories. In Gaiman's version of the fairy tale, his protagonist's adult and child perspectives are interwoven seamlessly, giving us a sense of how he experienced his past at that time, as well as how it affected him for the rest of his life. Reading Gaiman's new novel, his first for adults since 2005's The Anansi Boys, is like listening to that rare friend whose dreams you actually want to hear about at breakfast. The narrator, an unnamed Brit, has returned to his hometown for a funeral. Drawn to a farm he dimly recalls from his youth, he's flooded with strange memories: of a suicide, the malign forces it unleashed and the three otherworldly females who helped him survive a terrifying odyssey. Gaiman's at his fantasy-master best here—the struggle between a boy and a shape-shifter with "rotting-cloth eyes" moves at a speedy, chilling clip. What distinguishes the book, though, is its evocation of the powerlessness and wonder of childhood, a time when magic seems as likely as any other answer and good stories help us through. "Why didn't adults want to read about Narnia, about secret islands and ... dangerous fairies?" the hero wonders. Sometimes, they do. AwardsDistinctionsNotable Lists
It began for our narrator forty years ago when the family lodger stole their car and committed suicide in it, stirring up ancient powers best left undisturbed. Dark creatures from beyond the world are on the loose, and it will take everything our narrator has just to stay alive: there is primal horror here, and menace unleashed - within his family and from the forces that have gathered to destroy it. His only defense is three women, on a farm at the end of the lane. The youngest of them claims that her duckpond is ocean. The oldest can remember the Big Bang. No library descriptions found.
|
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
![]() GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)823.914Literature English & Old English literatures English fiction 1900- 1901-1999 1945-1999LC ClassificationRatingAverage:![]()
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
I got this book under the recommendation of my sister, who absolutely loved it. I didn’t read the back cover, I didn’t look it up on the internet, she didn’t tell me exactly (or at all) what it was about. It was just one of those blind reads that I like doing. All I knew is that it was written by Gaiman, and that is good enough for me.
Or so I thought.
I had a great time. Some passages really captured me. The mystery about the boy’s name is super cool (and actually it’s not a mystery, it’s just a fact), but… I don’t know. I think it takes more than a Nameless Protagonist to make a book mind blowing.
I really appreciate all the female characters Mr. Gaiman gave to us in this book. They’re unique in their own way. The Maiden/Mother/Crone triad represented by the Hempstock women was an excellent touch, and even though I wanted to kill the Younger Sister, I also liked her as a functioning character in the story.
The details about certain aspects, such as the cats in the story, the faeric atmosphere surrounding this novella, the easy-reading of the narrative (a characteristic of Mr. Gaiman’s works) was all very pleasing, but the core of the story, or at least how this core was delivered, really bugged me.
I swear to god, I wanted to love this book. That didn’t pan out.
In the end and in its essence, this book felt like a lot of catchphrases jumbled together into one narrative to give that feeling that adults love: the romantization of childhood, since we adults love a good nostalgia. It was like reading “Oh, look at how a child’s innocence and imagination is so much better than being an Adult, here, let me show you The Childhood Secrets™ by writing A Lot Of Sentences That Are Supposed to Be Impactful And Quotable On Social Media”.
Continue with spoilers >>
For the first third of the book, I kept waiting for the POV to come back to Adult Protagonist, until I gave up and realized that yes, I was stuck with this seven year old boy.
Fine, I thought, I can take it.
So until half of the book I was still trying to accept that that boy was my protagonist. When I finally settled for him, the reading was more fluid for me.
The episode in the bathtub was really unsettling and impactful, which was the entire point of it, and it made me dislike the father for the rest of the story, because according to “the thing that called itself Ursula Monkton”, she didn’t make anyone do anything. So there’s that, but I’m not sure how trustful she could be here.
And the cats. I really appreciate the fondness in which Gaiman describes the multiple cats featured in this book, and the relationship between them and their humans. In a time where the world of entertainment loves to portray cats as evil, mean, animals and associate them with unhappy, lonely, worthy-of-pity people (I shiver as I remember Grey’s Anatomy, my last exposure to this type of portrayal), having Mr. Gaiman’s take on the wonderful relationship the Boy had with his cats, and even the peaceful way he described the fog-colored cat of the Hempstocks, was really, really nice.
Like I said earlier, I really liked the Hempstocks, obviously. They’re the entire story for me, I felt compelled into searching the web about where Gaiman got the inspiration to write them, I thought it was a clever move to never give the boy a name, and I felt very enraptured in the action scenes, which isn’t usually the case for me, but overall… I didn’t love the book to understand why it got so many nominations and prizes. My life didn’t change because of it, my views are still the same.
Oh, and one last thing: the protagonist forgetting everything. Man, that’s some cheap trick right there. It’s an unfair and cheap narrative trick that always pissed me off (most notably in Doctor Who, IF YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN), and I stand by what I think here. The only thing worse than that is the “and then he woke up”.
Anyway.
This book was a nice ride, full of ups and downs.
I’m giving this 3 stars because I have a lot of mixed feelings about it, but overall, it was good. (