

Click on a thumbnail to go to Google Books.
Loading... The Amber Spyglass (2000)by Philip Pullman
![]()
Best Fantasy Novels (99) » 63 more Booker Prize (62) Best Young Adult (79) 20th Century Literature (238) Books Read in 2019 (109) Books Read in 2023 (115) Female Protagonist (230) Books Read in 2018 (252) Favourite Books (829) Overdue Podcast (123) Books Read in 2015 (1,117) Ghosts (49) Books Read in 2020 (1,545) Books Read in 2017 (1,844) Books Read in 2009 (45) Books Read in 2021 (2,496) Read These Too (28) Religious Fiction (51) 2000s decade (55) Childhood Favorites (248) Books Read in 2014 (1,862) Fate vs. Free Will (13) Books Read in 2006 (158) Books Read in 2001 (42) Books Read in 2010 (293) Books tagged favorites (257) Sarah's Wish List (35) Biggest Disappointments (480) Unread books (885) No current Talk conversations about this book. MASTERPIECE. There are so many deep ideas at play by the time this trilogy reaches its stunning conclusion. I thought I might not get as emotional rereading this book as an adult, but NOPE, it hurt just as a much as it did the first time. There is no way to get through this book without WEEPING (at multiple points in the story, might I add). Also… has there every been a children's series as concerned with death as this one??
And as the bumpy journey among these dark materials comes to an end, there is the most moving of scenes: all fantasy subdued and only human frailty revealed in the real world of Oxford's Botanic Garden. Belongs to SeriesBelongs to Publisher SeriesGallimard, Folio (4617) Gallimard, Folio SF (146) Heyne Allgemeine Reihe (86424) Is contained inHas the adaptationHas as a student's study guideAwardsDistinctionsNotable Lists
Lyra and Will find themselves at the center of a battle between the forces of the Authority and those gathered by Lyra's father, Lord Asriel. No library descriptions found.
|
Current DiscussionsNonePopular covers
![]() GenresMelvil Decimal System (DDC)823.914Literature English & Old English literatures English fiction 1900- 1901-1999 1945-1999LC ClassificationRatingAverage:![]()
Is this you?Become a LibraryThing Author. |
Pullman’s characterization is good only when he concentrates. His main characters, Will and Lyra, are quite convincingly drawn and I came to care about them, but the other characters in the book, even quite important ones, are only sketched and don’t exist in any depth.
Although Will and Lyra are juveniles, this is a very serious adult story in which seriously bad things happen. It doesn’t make comfortable reading, and I’m really surprised that it became so popular.
I should perhaps mention that Pullman appears to be virulently anti-Christian. This isn’t a particular problem for me as I’m fairly anti-religious myself, but I was a bit startled by the strength of his feelings.
When I finished this trilogy, I was disgusted with the ending.
When you write fantasy, particularly with the sort of wide-open licence Pullman gives himself, you can have any sort of ending you want. If he gives us an ending no better than that, it’s because that’s the sort of ending he wants, which indicates that he and I are thoroughly incompatible. I don't expect I’ll ever read any of his other books, because plainly he has no intention of delivering the kind of book I want to read.
There are rarely happy endings in real life; but we experience real life whether we like it or not. We read fiction by choice, and I choose not to read fiction that allows me to emerge at the end feeling dismal and let down. Fiction is entertainment; if I’m not agreeably entertained, I don’t come back for more.
It’s admittedly difficult to imagine an ending for Will and Lyra of the form “… and so they lived happily ever after.” Neither of them was suited to be written off in such a quiet and peaceful way. Any happy ending for them would really require several more books to be written about their subsequent adventures. Indeed, even with the ending as written, I suspect that they got up to many unreported adventures after the end of the story.
The really unpleasant thing is that they were condemned to do so separately. Pullman contrived that they eventually fell in love with each other and were then almost immediately required (for bizarre reasons of cosmic expediency) never to see each other again. It might even have been preferable if one or both of them had died.
I was reminded of the story of John Lennon’s first meeting with Yoko Ono. He was at an avant-garde art exhibition, and one of the exhibits involved climbing up a ladder and peering through a magnifying glass at something. When he did so, what he saw was “Yes”. He was pleased that the message turned out to be positive, and sought to meet the artist.
With Pullman, I felt that I spent quite a long and weary time climbing the ladder, looked through the magnifying glass, and saw “No”. I feel no desire to meet the artist.
I had my own copies of these books, but I later got rid of them. This is not the sort of thing I want to reread. (